Manager Coaching Assignment

For this assignment pick TWO scenarios and use the GROW MODEL TEMPLATE document to state how you would coach the manager. All scenarios should be in the same Microsoft Word file. Note, there is a BONUS scenario. If you choose to complete the bonus scenario, please make that scenario the last one for me to review. This assignment is NOT an APA writing assignment so references are NOT needed. You must use the 6 STEPS FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK TEMPLATE for this assignment. Be sure to provide enough depth with each step of the GROW MODEL that shows your understanding of strategic HR, employment laws, company policy standards, etc. ********Written Assignment 6-Coaching Managers (to give feedback) Format —-Use this format to prepare your two (2) Manager Coaching Plans. You can submit all plans within one Word file/document. Be sure to start a new page when you are addressing a new issue.Grading Rubric – MBA 6334 Writing Assignments  Levels of Assessment Criteria Inadequate = 2.25 points(Below Standard)Adequate = 8.25 points(Meets Standard)Above Average = 12.5 points(Exceeds Standard)Exemplary = 16.67 points(Far Exceeds Standard)Organization Writing lacks logical organization.  It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity.  Serious errors. Writing is coherent and logically organized.  Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout essay.    Writing is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence.  Overall unity of ideas is present. Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points.  Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. Level of Content Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal. Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas.  Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, indepth analysis and evidences original thought and support for the topic. Development Main points lack detailed development.  Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking. Main points are present with limited detail and development.  Some critical thinking is present.  Main points well developed with quality supporting details and quantity.  Critical thinking is weaved into points Main points well developed with high quality and quantity support.  Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Grammar & Mechanics Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent.  Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar correct allowing reader to progress though essay. Some errors remain. Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons. Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. Supporting References Student did not provide references in document. Student provided 1 reference in document; source is not credible. Student provided 1 reference in document; source is credible in nature. Student provided 2 or more credible references within the document. APA Format Fails to follow format and assignment requirements; incorrect margins, spacing  and indentation; neatness of essay needs attention. Meets some format and assignment requirements; generally correct margins, spacing, and indentations; essay is neat but may have some assembly errors.  Meets most format and assignment requirements; margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; essay is neat and correctly assembled. Meets all formal and assignment requirements and evidences attention to detail; all margins, spacing and indentations are correct; essay is neat and correctly assembled with professional look.